Dropcontact Review 2025: Pricing, Reliability & GDPR
SaaS & Tools

Dropcontact Review 2025: Pricing, Reliability & GDPR

November 26, 2025 25 min

🎯 Key Takeaways

  • 99% deliverability verified on 15,000 contacts (bounce rate <2%)
  • 100% GDPR compliant with real-time algorithmic generation and zero stored database
  • Best email enrichment for France/Europe, less coverage internationally
  • Weakness: no mobile numbers—pair it with Kaspr for calling

Hey everyone! If you're still struggling to find valid B2B emails, this article will help you out. I spent several months testing Dropcontact on over 15,000 contacts to see if this 100% compliant solution really lives up to its promises or if it's just well-packaged marketing.

Spoiler: It's great but it's not for everyone. We'll see together why it's become an excellent tool for French sales teams, but also why some users complain about the pricing. For pure cold calling, look elsewhere.

What Exactly Is Dropcontact?

Dropcontact is THE French reference for B2B email enrichment. Their thing? No stored database, only proprietary algorithms working in real-time. Concretely, you throw in a name + company, and boom, the tool gives you the verified professional email with a deliverability rate close to 99%.

Who Is It For?

Who? Sales, Growth Managers, RevOps, basically anyone doing B2B prospecting in France and Europe. If you want to stop ending up in spam and sleep peacefully regarding GDPR, this is exactly what you need.

The Problem Solved?

You know the nightmare: you generate leads, but half the emails kill your deliverability. Your domain gets penalized, and you systematically end up in spam. Result: your outbound campaigns are dead before they even start.

Even worse, you have duplicates everywhere in your CRM, incomplete data, and your team spends 30% of their time on manual data entry instead of closing.

Dropcontact solves these problems automatically:

- Emails verified at 99% deliverability

- Intelligent deduplication without common key

- Multi-data enrichment (position, LinkedIn, legal info)

- Total GDPR compliance to sleep peacefully

- CRM integration to automate all this

Market Positioning

Dropcontact clearly positions itself as the premium European alternative to American giants like Apollo or ZoomInfo. Their differentiating argument? GDPR compliance isn't an option, it's in the product's DNA.

They target companies that don't want to play with fire legally, that prioritize quality over quantity, and that mainly target the French and European market.

Detailed Features (The Real Test)

1. Ultra-Reliable Email Enrichment

How does it work concretely?

The reactor core is here. You provide 3 minimum pieces of info: first name, last name, company website. Dropcontact runs its algorithms to generate possible email combinations ([email protected], [email protected], etc.), then tests in real-time via validation servers if the email actually exists.

What differentiates it from the competition:

- No static database that becomes obsolete

- Real-time verification, not just a "probability"

- Proprietary algorithms that continuously improve

- Deliverability rate close to 99% (I verified it on 15,000 contacts)

My field test:

I enriched 3 different files to compare:

- File A: 5,000 B2B SaaS contacts France → 94% emails found, bounce rate at 1.2%

- File B: 3,000 SME contacts all sectors Europe → 87% found, bounce rate at 1.8%

- File C: 2,000 US startup contacts → 62% found, bounce rate at 3.4%

Verdict: On France and Europe, it performs well. On the US, it's less efficient but still decent. The bounce rate always stays below 2% in Europe, which is excellent for your deliverability.

Solid use case:

You scrape 800 decision-makers on LinkedIn Sales Navigator for an outbound campaign. You only have first name, last name and company.

You throw that into Dropcontact via a simple CSV import.

15 minutes later, you get 720+ verified emails, ready for your Lemlist or Saleshandy sequence.

You launch your campaign with a bounce < 2%, your domain stays clean, and your open rate explodes compared to an unverified list.

2. Automatic Cleaning And Deduplication

The problem we all have:

Your CRM looks like a battlefield. Jean Dupont exists 4 times in different forms (J. Dupont, Jean DUPONT, jean.dupont@...). You lose a monstrous amount of time, you follow up 3 times with the same person (ridiculous), and your analytics are distorted.

The Dropcontact solution:

The deduplication algorithm is impressive. It detects duplicates even without a common key. It compares names (with typo tolerance), companies, emails, and intelligently merges by keeping the best info from each record.

What it really changes:

- Automatic typo correction (Dupond → Dupont)

- Civility normalization (M., Monsieur, Mr → M.)

- Duplicate merging with best data preservation

- Obsolete position updates

My experience:

I cleaned a database of 8,000 contacts with an estimated 18% duplicates. Dropcontact detected 1,847 (actually 23%, I had underestimated).

After merging, my database went down to 6,153 unique contacts, all with normalized data.

Time saved: approximately 15 hours of manual work avoided.

3. Bulletproof GDPR Compliance (The Real Game-Changer)

Why is this massive?

GDPR isn't just an administrative constraint, it's a sword of Damocles. A company caught with purchased or poorly sourced data can face up to 4% of global revenue in fines. For a startup, that's death.

The Dropcontact approach:

Zero stored database = zero risk. Everything is generated on demand via algorithms. You never "own" personal data from a third-party database. You generate the email from public information (name + company), exactly as you would manually.

Why lawyers love it:

- No personal data transfer from a database

- Algorithmically defensible generation legally

- Servers in Europe (no US transfer)

- Clear documentation for CNIL audits

Comparison with competition:

- Apollo, Lusha, ZoomInfo → massive scraped databases = GDPR gray zone

- Dropcontact → on-demand generation = proven compliance

For any serious French company, this is a non-negotiable argument. I spoke with 3 RevOps who told me this was THE reason for their switch to Dropcontact.

4. Native CRM Integrations (The Automation That Changes Everything)

Natively supported CRMs:

- Pipedrive (the most accomplished integration)

- HubSpot (could be improved, but functional)

- Salesforce (solid for large structures)

The workflow in automatic mode:

1. A lead arrives in your CRM (form, LinkedIn prospecting, trade show...)

2. Dropcontact triggers automatically in the background

3. The tool enriches all missing data (email, position, LinkedIn, SIREN...)

4. The contact is deduplicated if an equivalent already exists

5. The record is updated without you touching anything

Concrete use case from one of my clients:

SaaS startup with 2 BDRs generating 100 leads/week.

Before Dropcontact: 3h/week of manual entry and email verification.

After: 0 minutes. BDRs focus 100% on prospecting and closing.

My feedback:

I've been using the Pipedrive integration for 4 months. It's smooth, runs in the background, I don't think about it anymore.

The only annoying thing: the HubSpot integration is less polished. There were looping enrichment bugs that consumed credits.

Dropcontact fixed it, but stay vigilant on your consumption if you're on HubSpot.

5. Multi-Data Enrichment (Much More Than Email)

Beyond email, Dropcontact gives you a bunch of additional info that makes the difference:

Automatically enriched data:

- Civility: M., Ms., normalized (useful for email personalization)

- Normalized position: "Sales Manager" instead of "Sales Ninja Rockstar"

- LinkedIn profile: direct link to profile (for research and social selling)

- Legal info: SIREN, NAF code, headquarters address (great for qualification)

- Phone: company landline only (no mobile, big weak point)

Why it's useful in practice:

Imagine you launch a targeted prospecting campaign on "Marketing Directors" in SMEs of 20-50 employees in Île-de-France. With enriched data, you can:

- Filter by normalized position (bye fancy titles)

- Qualify by size via SIREN

- Personalize your emails with correct civility

- Check LinkedIn before calling to adapt your pitch

What's sorely missing:

Mobile numbers. That's the big hole in the racket. You only get the company landline, which is useless for direct cold calling.

6. The Interface: Simple But Effective

CSV import in drag-and-drop:

The experience is bewilderingly simple. You drag your CSV file, map the columns (last name, first name, company), and you're off.

No need for training, no doc to read. My intern understood in 2 minutes.

Batch processing:

Depending on volume, it takes from a few minutes to an hour. For 1,000 contacts, count 10-15 minutes.

You can follow progress in real-time and download the enriched file as soon as it's done.

Tracking dashboard:

You have a clear view of your credit consumption, ongoing enrichments, and history. It's clean, no frills, it does the job.

Improvement point:

Several users (and myself first) would have liked to be able to select columns to enrich upstream to save credits.

For example, if I just want the email without LinkedIn or SIREN, I can't choose. It's all or nothing.

Dropcontact Pricing & Plans

Let's talk money: this is where it gets tricky for many users.

The Pricing Model

Dropcontact works on a credit per search system. One contact = one credit consumed.

Ultra-important point to understand: You pay per search, not per result found. If Dropcontact doesn't find the contact's email, the credit is still debited.

Let's be honest: this is my main beef with Dropcontact. The "payment per search" vs "payment per result" model changes everything.

With Prospeo, you only pay for emails actually found and verified. With Dropcontact, you pay per attempt.

Result? You can consume 20% of credits "empty" if your file is complicated.

It's technically understandable (algorithmic calculation has a cost), but financially frustrating.

The Different Plans (2025 Pricing)

Forget the classic "Starter/Pro/Premium" plans. Here, it's custom: you decide how many credits you want per month, and the pricing adapts. The more volume you do, the more the unit cost drops.

1st example: €28/month for 500 credits (€0.056/credit)

2nd example: €79/month for 2,500 credits (€0.031/credit)

3rd example: €199/month for 11,000 credits (€0.018/credit)

(Note: pricing evolves, check the site for exact prices)

My Cost/Benefit Analysis

For an SME enriching 1,000 contacts/month:

- Cost: ~€50/month on the adapted plan

- Time saved: 10h of manual research avoided (i.e. €400 if you value the hour at €40)

- ROI: largely positive

For a freelancer with 50 contacts/month:

- Cost: minimum €24/month (and you only use 50 credits out of 400)

- Lost credits: 350 unused credits

- Verdict: not profitable, look for a pay-as-you-go alternative

For a scale-up with 5,000 contacts/month:

- Cost: ~€250/month

- Manual alternative: unthinkable

- Competition alternative: Apollo at €150/month but lower quality and risky GDPR

- Verdict: justified investment for quality and compliance

My Pricing Recommendation

Take Dropcontact if:

- You regularly enrich your lists (>500 contacts/month)

- GDPR compliance justifies a dedicated budget

- You automate and enrich via CRM (you make it profitable quickly)

Look for an alternative if:

- You have very occasional needs (<200 contacts/month)

- Your budget is ultra-tight (<€50/month available)

- You want pay-as-you-go without commitment

Strengths (My Real Field Feedback)

1. Email Quality (Top Level Europe)

My verdict after several months of testing: 99% deliverability is not marketing, it's reality.

On 15,000 enriched contacts, I measured an average bounce rate of 1.4%. That's very good.

Comparison with competition:

- Apollo: ~5-8% bounce (sometimes obsolete data)

- Lusha: ~3-5% bounce (decent but less reliable)

- Dropcontact: ~1-2% bounce (top level)

Concrete impact on your campaigns:

A bounce rate at 1.5% vs 6% changes EVERYTHING. Your domain stays clean, you don't get blacklisted, and your open rate mechanically explodes.

On a campaign of 5,000 emails, that represents 225 more emails that actually arrive in inbox.

2. Total GDPR Compliance (Sleep Peacefully)

I already said it, but I'll repeat: zero stored database = zero CNIL risk. For any serious French company, it's the massive argument.

I spoke with a DPO (Data Protection Officer) from a Parisian scale-up. Their feedback: "Dropcontact is the only enrichment tool we can easily defend in audit. Everything else is in a gray zone."

If you manage sensitive data or if you're in a regulated sector (health, finance, HR), it's almost mandatory.

3. Ease Of Use

The 3 reasons:

- Clean interface, no frills

- Ultra-simple CSV drag-and-drop

- No training necessary

My intern enriched his first file in 5 minutes without me explaining anything. That's rare in B2B SaaS.

4. Top-Notch Customer Service (Really)

I had the opportunity to contact them 3 times:

- Response in less than 2h each time

- Human responses, not copy-paste

- Quick problem resolution

Anecdote: I had a Pipedrive integration bug that was consuming double credits. Ticket opened Tuesday morning, bug fixed and credits refunded Wednesday afternoon. Zero hassle.

In a SaaS world where support is often catastrophic, it deserves to be highlighted.

5. Solid CRM Integrations (Especially Pipedrive)

Automation via CRM changes the game. Once configured, you don't think about it anymore. Leads arrive, Dropcontact enriches in the background, and your salespeople directly have complete info.

My experience on Pipedrive:

Configuration in 10 minutes via OAuth. Then, 100% automatic. Each new contact created (manually, via form, or import) is automatically enriched. Duplicates are merged. Everything happens in the background.

6. Multi-Data Enrichment (360° Prospect View)

Beyond email, you get normalized position, LinkedIn, SIREN, NAF code... It allows you to finely qualify and segment.

Use case:

You scrape 2,000 "marketing managers" on LinkedIn. Problem: job titles are all different (CMO, Marketing Director, Head of Marketing, Marketing Team Lead...).

Dropcontact normalizes all that. You can then cleanly filter by seniority level and adapt your sales pitch accordingly. It's game-changing for personalization.

Limitations (Let's Be Really Honest)

1. The Frustrating Pricing Model

I already said it, but it's the #1 pain point: payment per search, not per result.

Concrete example that annoys:

You enrich 500 contacts. Dropcontact finds 420 emails (84% success rate, that's good). But you still consumed 500 credits, so paid for the 80 contacts without result.

For some, it's acceptable (algorithmic calculation has a cost). For others, it's unacceptable (I pay for a result, not for an attempt).

My opinion: It's frustrating, but technically understandable. However, Dropcontact could improve communication on this point and maybe offer a "result only" option at a premium price.

2. High Cost For Small Volumes

For a freelancer or micro-structure with <200 contacts/month, the minimum subscription of €24/month can be prohibitive, especially if you don't use all your credits.

Alternative: Combine several free/freemium tools (Hunter.io + NeverBounce) for small volumes. You lose in comfort and automation, but you save money.

3. No Mobile Numbers (Big Handicap)

It's the big hole in the racket. You only have company landlines, useless for effective cold calling.

Real impact:

If your sales approach relies 50%+ on phone (typical in complex or high-ticket solution sales), Dropcontact alone isn't enough.

Solution: Combine Dropcontact (email) + BetterContact, FullEnrich or Lusha (mobiles). You have both channels covered, but it doubles your tool budget.

4. Lower Performance Outside Europe

The tool is clearly optimized for France and Europe. If you prospect massively in the US, Asia or Latin America, results will be disappointing.

My test numbers:

- France: 94% emails found

- Europe: 87% found

- US: 62% found

- Asia: ~40% found

Verdict: If your market is global, look at Apollo or Prospeo (but watch out for GDPR if you also target Europe).

5. Missing Data On Certain Profiles

The tool isn't magic. On certain niche profiles, certain sectors (construction, crafts), or very recent contacts (person who just changed jobs), Dropcontact can struggle.

Examples reported by users:

- Construction sector: lower success rate

- Very senior profiles (C-level in large companies): sometimes difficult to find

- Early-stage startups: data not always up to date

My analysis: It's normal, the algo can't guess everything. But it remains frustrating when you pay a credit without result.

6. HubSpot Integration Could Be Improved

Several users (and feedback I got directly) report issues with the HubSpot integration:

- Looping enrichment bugs that consumed credits

- Sometimes slow synchronization

- Less smooth than Pipedrive integration

Dropcontact fixed some bugs, but if you're on HubSpot, monitor your credit consumption closely the first few weeks to verify everything's running smoothly.

7. Missing Features

- Integrated list cleaning tool (verify emails without enriching)

- Column selection to enrich upstream (to save credits)

- Enrichment from a simple company website (without person name)

- More documented API for custom integrations

- Webhook to notify when enrichment is complete

Nothing blocking, but improvements that would be welcome.

Dropcontact In Practice: My 5 Killer Workflows

Workflow 1: Enrich A Prospect List Before Cold Email Campaign

Context: You get 500 contacts from a trade show, or you scrape LinkedIn. You only have name + company, no email.

Steps:

1. Export your list in CSV with columns: First Name, Last Name, Company (or Website)

2. Import into Dropcontact via drag-and-drop

3. Wait 10-15 minutes (depending on volume)

4. Download enriched file with verified emails

5. Import into Lemlist, Instantly or Saleshandy

6. Launch your outbound sequence

Expected result:

- 85-95% emails found (depending on initial data quality)

- Bounce rate < 2%

- Maximum deliverability

Workflow 2: Total Automation Via CRM (My Pipedrive Setup)

Context: You want to automate enrichment of each new lead without lifting a finger.

My setup:

1. Connect Dropcontact to Pipedrive (10 min config)

2. Activate automatic enrichment on contact creation

3. Define deduplication rules

4. Configure fields to synchronize (email, LinkedIn, position...)

What happens next:

1. A lead arrives (web form, manual prospecting, LinkedIn import...)

2. Dropcontact detects the new contact

3. The tool automatically enriches email, position, LinkedIn, legal info

4. If a duplicate exists, automatic merge with best data preservation

5. Slack notification when enrichment is complete

Result: My 2 BDRs stopped doing manual entry. 100% of their time is on prospecting and closing.

Workflow 3: CRM Database Cleaning (The Big Cleanup)

Context: Your CRM is a mess. Duplicates everywhere, obsolete emails, incomplete info. You want to clean all that before a big campaign.

Method:

1. Export your entire CRM database in CSV

2. Run everything through Dropcontact in batch mode

3. The tool detects duplicates, corrects errors, updates emails

4. Re-import cleaned database into your CRM

5. Merge detected duplicates

My personal case:

Database of 8,000 contacts, 18% estimated duplicates. After Dropcontact pass: 6,153 unique contacts, normalized data. 1,847 duplicates merged. Time saved: 15h of manual work avoided, and above all an exploitable database.

Operation cost: 8,000 credits = approximately €320 depending on plan. Made profitable in 1 clean campaign.

Workflow 4: The Dropcontact + Kaspr Combo (Email + Mobile)

Context: You want to do multichannel outbound (email + phone) but Dropcontact doesn't provide mobiles.

The winning stack:

1. Scrape your prospects on LinkedIn Sales Navigator

2. Use Kaspr to get mobiles (Chrome extension)

3. Export your list with name + company + mobile

4. Run through Dropcontact to get verified emails

5. You now have a complete list: name, company, verified email, mobile

Result: You can attack multichannel. Cold email via Lemlist + cold call via your CRM. Conversion rate multiplied by 2 compared to a single channel.

Overall cost: Dropcontact (~€100/month) + Kaspr (~€50/month) = €150/month. It's the setup I personally use, and it's formidable.

Workflow 5: Post-Event Enrichment

Context: You just did a webinar or trade show. You have 300 registrants with just first name, last name, company (no professional email, often personal emails).

Process:

1. Get participant list

2. Clean to keep just first name + last name + company

3. Run through Dropcontact to find professional emails

4. Enrich with position, LinkedIn, legal info

5. Segment by seniority and sector

6. Launch ultra-personalized follow-up sequences

My case: Webinar with 280 registrants. 75% useless personal emails for B2B outbound. After Dropcontact: 210 professional emails recovered (75% success).

Alternatives & Comparisons (The Complete Benchmark)

Dropcontact vs Apollo

Apollo: The American giant, database of 275M+ contacts, strong on US market.

Comparison:

| Criteria | Dropcontact | Apollo |

|---------|-------------|--------|

| Email quality Europe | 9/10 | 6/10 |

| Email quality US | 6/10 | 8/10 |

| GDPR compliance | 10/10 | 3/10 |

| Mobile numbers | 0/10 | 7/10 |

| Price | 7/10 | 8/10 |

| Ease of use | 9/10 | 7/10 |

When to choose Apollo:

- You mainly target US market

- You want mobiles included

- Budget is tight (cheaper than Dropcontact)

- GDPR isn't an absolute priority

When to choose Dropcontact:

- You target France/Europe

- GDPR compliance is non-negotiable

- You prioritize quality over quantity

- You want maximum deliverability

My verdict: If you're in France and target Europe, Dropcontact crushes Apollo. For US market, Apollo is better.

Dropcontact vs Kaspr

Kaspr: LinkedIn enrichment specialist with strong focus on mobile numbers.

Comparison:

| Criteria | Dropcontact | Kaspr |

|---------|-------------|-------|

| Email quality | 9/10 | 7/10 |

| Mobile numbers | 0/10 | 9/10 |

| GDPR compliance | 10/10 | 8/10 |

| Batch enrichment | 9/10 | 6/10 |

| CRM integration | 9/10 | 7/10 |

| Price | 6/10 | 7/10 |

When to choose Kaspr:

- Your approach massively relies on cold calling

- You prospect mainly via LinkedIn

- You want direct mobiles

When to choose Dropcontact:

- Email is your main channel

- You do regular batch enrichment

- You want advanced CRM automation

The winning combo: Use both. Dropcontact for email + Kaspr for mobiles = formidable setup for multichannel outbound.

Dropcontact vs Lusha

Lusha: Direct competitor with similar approach but more global coverage.

Comparison:

| Criteria | Dropcontact | Lusha |

|---------|-------------|-------|

| Email quality Europe | 9/10 | 7/10 |

| International coverage | 6/10 | 8/10 |

| GDPR compliance | 10/10 | 7/10 |

| Mobile numbers | 0/10 | 7/10 |

| Customer service | 9/10 | 6/10 |

| Price | 6/10 | 7/10 |

When to choose Lusha:

- You prospect internationally (outside Europe)

- You want mobiles

- You want an "all-in-one" tool

When to choose Dropcontact:

- Your main market is Europe

- GDPR compliance is critical

- You want the best possible email quality

Dropcontact vs Hunter.io

Hunter.io: The historical email search tool, freemium model.

Comparison:

| Criteria | Dropcontact | Hunter.io |

|---------|-------------|-----------|

| Email quality | 9/10 | 6/10 |

| Small volumes price | 6/10 | 9/10 |

| GDPR compliance | 10/10 | 6/10 |

| CRM integration | 9/10 | 5/10 |

| Ease of use | 9/10 | 8/10 |

When to choose Hunter.io:

- You're starting with very small volumes (<100/month)

- Ultra-tight budget (freemium offer)

- Occasional need, not recurring

When to choose Dropcontact:

- You do regular volume (>500/month)

- You want to automate via CRM

- Quality is priority over price

My Comparative Verdict

- Most versatile tool: Apollo (but risky GDPR)

- Best for Europe: Dropcontact

- Best for mobiles: Kaspr

- Best value for money: Lusha

- Best to start: Hunter.io

My recommended stack:

- Tight budget: Hunter.io alone

- France/Europe market, email focus: Dropcontact alone

- Multichannel outbound: Dropcontact + Kaspr

- US market: Apollo

My Final Verdict (No Bullshit)

After several months of intensive use, 15,000+ enriched contacts, tests on 8 different campaigns, and dozens of exchanges with other users, here's my definitive opinion:

Dropcontact is the absolute reference for B2B email enrichment in France and Europe. Period. If GDPR compliance and data quality are your priorities, it's a no-brainer. You won't find better on the European market.

But (because there's always a "but"), it's not a miracle tool. The cost model can be frustrating, the absence of mobiles is a real lack, and if you prospect massively outside Europe, look elsewhere.

My Overall Rating: 8.5/10

Strengths that justify the rating:

- Email quality (9.5/10)

- GDPR compliance (10/10)

- Ease of use (9/10)

- Customer service (9.5/10)

- CRM integrations (8.5/10)

Weaknesses that prevent the 10/10:

- Frustrating pricing for small volumes (6/10)

- No mobile numbers (0/10)

- Performance outside Europe (6/10)

- HubSpot integration could be improved (7/10)

I Recommend It If:

- You're a B2B SME or startup targeting France and Europe

- GDPR compliance is non-negotiable for you (regulated sector, CNIL audit...)

- You want to automate enrichment via your CRM (Pipedrive, Salesforce...)

- You prioritize data quality over quantity

- Email is your main prospecting channel

- You do regular volume (>500 contacts/month)

- You want a bounce rate < 2% to preserve your deliverability

- You're looking for a simple tool, no training necessary

I Don't Recommend It If:

- You're a freelancer with very occasional needs (< 100 contacts/month)

- Your sales approach massively relies on phone (no mobiles provided)

- You prospect mainly outside Europe (US, Asia, Latin America)

- You have an ultra-tight budget (< €50/month available)

- You want pure pay-as-you-go without monthly subscription

- You want an "all-in-one" tool with mobiles + emails + social (take Apollo)

Last Advice Before You Start

Test before committing to 12 months. Take the free trial, enrich a sample of 200-300 contacts representative of your target, and measure:

- Success rate (how many emails found?)

- Bounce rate (send a test campaign)

- Time saved (vs manual research)

If the 3 indicators are good, go for it. If the success rate is < 70%, it's because your market isn't optimal for Dropcontact (probably outside Europe or niche sector).

My 3 Last Tips To Maximize Your ROI:

- Combine with an email verification tool (NeverBounce, ZeroBounce) as double security if you send large volumes (> 10,000 emails/month)

- Automate via your CRM from the start, that's where you really make the tool profitable

- Monitor your credit consumption the first 2 weeks to adjust your plan if needed

There you go, you now have all the elements to decide if Dropcontact is for you. If you have questions, drop them in comments, I answer everything.